<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Meaning of Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netcogito.com/blog/2009/09/06/the-meaning-of-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netcogito.com/blog/2009/09/06/the-meaning-of-life/</link>
	<description>Towards a new Liberalism: rational, compassionate and progressive</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimS</title>
		<link>http://netcogito.com/blog/2009/09/06/the-meaning-of-life/comment-page-1/#comment-52065</link>
		<dc:creator>TimS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcogito.com/blog/?p=60#comment-52065</guid>
		<description>&quot;How big must one’s ego be in order to need to feel relevant to the whole universe? Flip the problem around, and recognize that the universe, or some captivating portion of it, can be relevant to you.&quot;

That&#039;s the best language I&#039;ve heard to describe a problem (and solution) at the root of much human disassociation. When you allow your worldview to be determined by yourself – when you make yourself into, and trust yourself to be, the observer - then opportunities for individual Purpose abound.

The message I come away with is that by allowing our own understanding of the Purpose of all things to be fluid (diminishing the &quot;big problems of overgeneralization or superstition&quot;) and by searching out our own Purpose in the portions of the universe that captivate us we will gravitate naturally to works that are positive. Atheist or not, it&#039;s an ideal approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How big must one’s ego be in order to need to feel relevant to the whole universe? Flip the problem around, and recognize that the universe, or some captivating portion of it, can be relevant to you.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the best language I&#8217;ve heard to describe a problem (and solution) at the root of much human disassociation. When you allow your worldview to be determined by yourself – when you make yourself into, and trust yourself to be, the observer &#8211; then opportunities for individual Purpose abound.</p>
<p>The message I come away with is that by allowing our own understanding of the Purpose of all things to be fluid (diminishing the &#8220;big problems of overgeneralization or superstition&#8221;) and by searching out our own Purpose in the portions of the universe that captivate us we will gravitate naturally to works that are positive. Atheist or not, it&#8217;s an ideal approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

